Human evidence is real but uneven across more than 30 trials and thousands of patients. For chronic hepatitis B, a randomized trial of 98 patients found delayed virological responses and histological improvement with a 26-week course. For sepsis, the 2013 ETASS trial of 361 patients was followed by the 2025 TESTS trial of 1106 patients, which showed no mortality benefit. A retrospective series of 76 severe COVID-19 patients reported lower mortality with treatment, 11.11% versus 30.00%, and older trials examined influenza vaccine responses in the elderly and cancer combinations.
The biggest question is which findings survive modern standards: the hepatitis trials predate current antivirals, the COVID data are retrospective, and the one large blinded trial was negative. The 2024 comprehensive review that calls the FDA's restriction unfounded is a narrative review rather than a meta-analysis. Compounded and imported products have not been shown to match the material used in trials. Whether any immune-marker change produces a clinical benefit in a given patient remains unproven outside hepatitis B.