The evidence base is a mix of mouse pharmacology and human biomarker studies. The founding 2015 paper and a 2021 follow-up showed metabolic and performance benefits in mice, and a meta-analysis of 602 participants found plasma MOTS-c lower in type 2 diabetes but, after subgrouping, higher in obesity. A human exercise study randomized subjects to endurance cycling, resistance exercise, or control and found that only endurance exercise raised circulating mitochondrial peptides. No human trial of synthetic MOTS-c has reported results.
The biggest gap is the absence of any controlled trial of the injected peptide, which the 2026 prediabetes study is the first to attempt. How much synthetic peptide survives injection, reaches muscle, and acts there is unmeasured in people. Biomarker studies cannot be read as evidence that a product works, since they measure the body's own peptide. Products sold online have no verified identity or purity, and the FDA's compounding review found no human safety information at all.